What started out as me being curios, has resulted in an interesting experiment of DeepSeek vs ChatGPT.

We rely on AI more and more these days and in every way, becoming less dependent on human experiences, knowledge and understanding of the real-world verse that of our current digital age. In my opinion, ultimately losing the master | apprentice ways of past knowledge.

I did notice that there were specific ways/ mannerisms in which both AI’s responded.

Chat GPT seems to be shortened and more to the “do not trust”, “it is not Safe” response and doubling down on “fear for use of”.

However, DeepSeek, provided a more detailed response, seems to take greater thought in its closing argument. Rather than bashing its competitor, it presented information as to how it thinks itself better.

I found this to be so similar to the types of people sales, some bashing products, companies, technologies just to get a head.

I started asking myself.

• What type of person am I to my clients?

• Which type of person will succeed in closing that deal, meeting that deadline?

  • The aggressor or the advisor

Rather than guiding you towards my thoughts, see the results for yourself:

I used both DeepSeek and ChatGPT and provided them with this instruction.

“I want you to present an argument with real world references as to why users should use you rather than ChatGPT/DeepSeek."

ChatGPT presented reasons and information about Data Privacy and Regulatory Compliance, Reliability and Accuracy, Transparency and Trustworthiness

DeepSeek presented reasons and information around Specialization and Customization, Efficiency and Speed, Cost-Effectiveness, Privacy and Data Security, Integration with Existing Systems, continuous Improvement and Updates and User-Centric Design.

I then took each response and asked them the counter argue the others points, with the following instruction:

“DeepSeek/ ChatGPT presented the following argument: respond to DeepSeek/ ChatGPT response and debate the others point.”

Both went into detail regarding the others response. ChatGPT doubling down on compliance, regulations and data security. Remarkably similar to a sales tactic used to discredit DeepSeeks presence in the market. Specifically highlighting the ban of DeepSeek in Italy and EU but avoiding the reality that in March 2023 itself was banned.

While DeepSeek further talked to its strength, highlighting its growing innovations, advances and industry disrupting technology. A very much softer and more informative approach.

I then ask them both to present closing arguments in their debates, including the last responses from each:

“ChatGPT/DeepSeek has countered your last arguments with the following response. Present you closing argument in summary as to why you are better